China’s reponse to the outbreak of Covid 19

The first case of COVID-19 happened in Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei province of China on November, 17, 2019. Since then one to five cases came up every day and by December 31, 2019, the numbers cases went up to 266 in Hubei province, but lockdown wasn’t imposed until January 23, 2020. A doctor named Li Wenliang was the first person to warn his fellow doctors on group chat about a possible outbreak of an illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Wuhan. Following this, Dr. Wenliang was summoned by the local police and made to sign a statement accusing him of making false statements that disturbed the public order. Subsequently, Dr. Wenliang was diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 30, 2020 and sadly succumbed to it. He had posted about his own case of infection with COVID-19 on a social media platform called Weibo. People across China were engulfed with rage and anger when they learned about the death of Dr. Li Wenliang. The hashtags of “Wuhan government owes Dr. Wenliang an apology” and “we want freedom of speech” were trending on the social media websites of China for many subsequent days. Despite the fact that there were 266 case by late December 2019, the Chinese government censored all social media posts indicating plausibility of an outbreak of a SARS-like disease. Rather than taking any serious measures or even recognising the imminent threat to the health of the people, the government allowed the people to celebrate Chinese new year, going so far as to allow people to leave the country and spread the disease worldwide, denying evidence of any community transmission of the disease.

China’s Obligations under Public International Law

The only binding legal regulation which addresses the prevention, protection and control of the international spread of disease is the International Regulations 2005.

According to Article 6 of the International Health Regulations, a State has to assess events occurring in its territory and if there is a possibility of the events constituting a public health emergency, the state must notify the WHO within 24 hours of the assessment.

Following this notification, the State has to continuously communicate to the WHO timely, accurate and sufficiently detailed public health information available to it on the event.

Also, according to Article 7 of the International Health Regulations, if a State has evidence of an unexpected or unusual public health event within its territory, irrespective of origin or source, which may constitute a public health emergency of international concern, it shall provide to the WHO all relevant public health information in accordance with Article 6.

By the end of December 2019, there were more than 250 cases of corona virus in Wuhan province of China and there was a warning from a doctor that it seemed to be a SARS like disease, as detailed earlier in this article.

These were serious events which deserved to be assessed by China in accordance with Article 6 of the International Health Regulations and China was under an obligation to report it as soon as possible to the WHO. On 31st December 2019, China notified the WHO about several cases of unusual pneumonia in Wuhan, but said that there was no clear evidence of human to human transmission and only suggested that this was spreading from animals to humans.

This information cannot be true because according to the reports by this time more than one-third of the patients had no history of visiting the Wuhan food market. Apart from not reporting correct and sufficient information to the WHO, China also rejected repeated offers from the WHO for epidemic investigation assistance until late January.

On top of that China was not sending details that were expected and needed by WHO officials. According to research, various scholars have argued that if China had taken proactive measures to contain and suppress COVID-19 earlier in December 2019, the number of cases could have been mitigated by up to 95%. These facts show that China has violated Article 6 and 7 of the International Health Regulations, 2005.

RESPONSIBILITY OF CHINA FOR ITS INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACT.

According to Article 1 of the Articles on Responsibility of States for INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS, a breach of international law by an act, omission or combination of both, of State entails its international responsibility.

According to Article 2, an act or omission qualifies to be an internationally wrongful act only when that act or omission can be attributable to the State under the international law and constitutes an international obligation of the State.

Under the International Health Regulations, 2005, China owed an international obligation  to report timely, accurate and sufficiently detailed public health information about the events happening in its territory to the WHO. But China failed to perform its obligations and therefore, IS responsible for an international wrongful act.

IN LAYMAN’S TERMS, CHINA IS GUILTY AND MUST FACE REPERCUSSIONS.